Plans To Regulate usergenerated Internet content Are Both Worrying And Pointless

As a broadcaster employed by a broadcaster within the Canadian broadcast trade, I clearly have a vested curiosity in the way forward for that trade — and, extra particularly, the extent to which the federal government intends on regulating it.

It's actually the place of my employer (i.e. Corus Leisure) that our present regulatory regime is just not reflective of the present broadcasting panorama, and that the regulatory burden falls closely on extra conventional Canadian broadcasters who're more and more competing with the unregulated content material being generated by worldwide tech giants comparable to Netflix, Amazon, and Spotify.

In different phrases, there's not a degree taking part in discipline at current.

There's little doubt that in our digital world, the idea of “broadcasting” has developed, but Canada’s Broadcasting Act appears caught in a distinct period. Affordable folks can disagree on what a contemporary Broadcasting Act would possibly appear to be, and whether or not meaning totally different rules, extra rules, or fewer rules.

Story continues under commercial

The federal authorities’s Bill C-10 is ostensibly aimed toward addressing all of those questions and bringing the Broadcasting Act into the twenty first century. Sadly, although a mixture of ineptitude, hubris and regulatory overreach, issues have gone fully off the rails.

Once more, what constitutes a “broadcaster” as of late is just a little nebulous, however it appears apparent that Canadians themselves — all 38-million of you — aren't broadcasters. Moreover, it appears apparent that what Canadians publish or share on-line doesn't represent a broadcast and it’s clearly not one thing that the Canadian Radio-Tv and Telecommunications Fee (CRTC) ought to concern itself with.

 » Read more from