The Deeper Roots Of C-10, In The Thickets Of Cultural Nationalism

How did it come to this? Depart apart, for the second, the implications – at no cost speech, for Canada’s repute, for internet neutrality – of Bill C-10, the federal authorities’s misbegotten effort to catch the web in the identical regulatory net as that which has lengthy enveloped the standard broadcasting business.

Depart apart, too, the invoice’s acknowledged rationale: that it's essential to determine a regulatory “degree enjoying discipline” between the standard broadcasters and their on-line rivals; that, to this finish, each must be regulated, slightly than neither, although the case for regulating both vanished way back.

Allow us to contemplate, slightly, the broader underlying foundation of the laws. In any case, when a authorities drives onto the rocks this badly – making an attempt to suit a regulatory mannequin constructed for a handful of over-the-air tv and radio stations to the limitless world of the web – it's often caught within the grip of some extra basic insanity.

The march of folly on which the federal government is now irrevocably embarked – first focusing on just a few massive, largely foreign-based streaming providers; later increasing to incorporate websites, akin to YouTube, that additionally show user-generated content material; arriving, in the end, on the madness of scoring 1000's of youngsters’ TikTok feeds for the way a lot Canadian content material they comprise – is of a sort it might certainly solely entertain if it felt it had no choice.

A part of that's politics as regular. The federal government is anxious to ship for a extremely vocal curiosity group: the cultural industries – particularly broadcasters,

 » Read more from www.theglobeandmail.com