Feedback Ofcyouare 22 hours in the past Simply to be clear, wiki admins don't have anything to do with it. It is Fandom. RealSinJax 21 hours in the past This must be pinned someplace apparent on the sub, I really feel so unhealthy for em lmao. Kothra 20 hours in the past Fandom/Wikia is such a fucking rubbish platform and it is solely gotten worse over time. It is an actual disgrace they took over gamepedia however it's nonetheless mindboggling that their service will get a lot use within the first place. TailRudder 19 hours in the past Why cannot they use precise Wikipedia? Is it in opposition to the Wikipedia guidelines? Radboy16 18 hours in the past It would not actually make sense to have an entire web page / set of pages on Wikipedia devoted to ingame gadgets and quests. It would not actually match the use case for Wikipedia in any respect. That is actually why issues like Fandom exist. After I do a search underneath the tarkov wiki, I do know the whole lot I am trying to find is said to tarkov itself.
Kothra 19 hours in the past
For those who imply the identical framework that Wikipedia makes use of (as a result of some websites do, or one very near it, they usually're positively a number of the higher wikis on the market), I feel it is as a result of they'd must pay for server prices themselves. Fandom hosts the whole lot for the customers/creators, however in trade we're pressured to take care of horrible fucking advertisements and no matter shitty format selections they determine to implement.» Read more from scifiaddicts.com